Les Miserables


 So let me start by saying that Les Miserables, the movie with Liam Neeson, Uma Thurman, and Claire Daines in 1998 was very, very good. And the broadway musical is really good, too. But the book is better than both by far. It's one of my five favorite books of all time. Adventure, romance, redemption, history, life lessons - it's got everything. Beautifully written by Victor Hugo.

I had high hopes for the movie with Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, and Helena Bonham Carter that came out in 2012 (that was ten years ago??) but it was a HUGE disappointment. I know many people loved it, so I'm not going to lay into it. I'm just going to mention the few things I didn't like. First, Russell Crowe can't sing, and that became abundantly clear during the movie, which for some reason (that I didn't like) was trying hard to be a musical. I REALLY hated the melodramatic way he glared at everyone in the factory while he was looking for Jean Valjean. But the main thing I didn't like was how the camera seemed intent to climb up the nose of every actor. VERY TIGHT closeups, revealing every blob of snot and dripping eyelash, was the only way to film these actors apparently. It made the movie very gross and not at all full of the beautiful romance of all other renditions, book, film or stage.

But if you want to see a good movie version, watch the 1998 with Liam Neeson. It's so well done and beautiful. It does a great job capturing the magic of the book.

I think both versions were PG, and the language, sex, nudity, and violence were all very toned down and stylized.

I highly recommend the 1998 version. I point out that many people loved the 2012 version, so if you want to see for yourself, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the Banshees of Inisherin

lost in translation

puss in boots